股骨近端防旋髓内钉和联合拉力交锁髓内钉系统治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较
作者:
作者单位:

(航天中心医院骨科,北京 100049)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R683.3; R592

基金项目:


Clinical efficacy of proximal femoral nail antirotation and Inter Tan in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly
Author:
Affiliation:

(Department of Orthopedics, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing 100049, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 对比股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)和联合拉力交锁髓内钉系统(Inter Tan)治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析2018年2月至2019年2月期间航天中心医院骨科收治的老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床资料,共49例。依据治疗方法分为2组:PFNA组(n=24)和Inter Tan组(n=25)。对比2组患者的手术时长、出血量、骨折愈合时长、住院时长、并发症发生率。对比2组患者随访6个月时的Harris评分和生活质量(QOL)评分。采用SPSS 13.0软件进行统计分析。2组间比较采用t检验或χ2检验。结果 2组患者术中均无螺钉松动穿出和固定断裂发生。PFNA组的手术时长[(43.04±6.25)和(72.58±6.49)min]和术中出血量[(124.5±18.8)和(238.9±25.6)ml]均显著低于Inter Tan组(P<0.05)。PFNA组患者术后并发症发生率显著高于Inter Tan组(16.0%和4.2%,P<0.05)。Inter Tan组和PFNA组术后6个月的Harris评分[(89.0±2.5)和(91.5±1.8)分]和QOL评分[(53.9±3.5)和(51.2±3.7)分]差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 Inter Tan和PFNA对老年股骨粗隆间骨折均具有良好的临床疗效,二者各具优缺点,临床可根据患者实际情况进行选择。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the clinical effect of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and Inter Tan (an intertrochanteric antegrade proximal femoral nailing system) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. Methods The clinical data of 49 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur admitted to our department from February 2014 to February 2019 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. According to the treatment, the patients were divided into PFNA group (n=24) and Inter Tan group (n=25). The operation time, bleeding volume, fracture healing time, hospitalization time and complication rate, and Harris score and quality of life (QOL) score after 6 months′ follow-up were compared between the 2 groups. SPSS statistics 13.0 was used for data analysis. Student′s t test or Chi-square test was employed for comparison between the 2 groups. Results No screw loosening or breakage was observed in both groups. The PFNA group had significantly shorter operation time [(43.04±6.25) vs (72.58±6.49)min] and less bleeding volume [(124.5±18.8) vs (238.9±25.6)ml], but obviously higher incidence rates of postoperative complications (16.0% vs 4.2%) when compared with the Inter Tan group (all P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in Harris score [(89.0±2.5) vs (91.5±1.8)] and QOL score [(53.9±3.5) vs (51.2±3.7)] between them at 6 months after operation (P>0.05).Conclusion Both Inter Tan and PFNA have good clinical efficacy in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages, and clinical selection should be based on the actual situation of patients.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

梁永辉,顾锋,李新天,郭文杰,李永军,李青松,刘申,梁勃冉,唐政杰,韦兴.股骨近端防旋髓内钉和联合拉力交锁髓内钉系统治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2020,19(6):443~446

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-21
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-06-28
  • 出版日期: