Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of locking plate for internal fixation and humeral head replacement in the treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in senior patients. Methods Clinical data of 74 old patients at the age of (76.35±4.78) years with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus admitted in our department from January 2008 to December 2012 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Forty-seven patients were treated by locking plate for internal fixation and 27 cases operated with humeral head replacement for 3- and 4-part fractures according to Neer classification system. The 2 groups were compared in the operation time, blood loss and Neer Scores at the end of follow-up. Results The follow-up period was 23.7 months (ranging from 12 to 43 months), which was similar in the 2 groups. The operation time was (95.4±8.57)min in the internal fixation group and (72.60±9.45)min in the replacement group, blood loss was (277.50±31.65)ml and (287.20±42.51)ml, and the rate of excellent and good outcomes by Neer scoring system was 82.9% and 85.2%, respectively, in the 2 groups. The operation time was significantly longer in the internal fixation group than in the replacement group (P<0.01). But there was no difference in blood loss and Neer score (P>0.05). Conclusion Both locking plate for internal fixation and humeral head replacement show good efficacy and satisfactory clinical outcomes for comminuted fractures of proximal humerus in the elderly. We suggest that locking plate is suitable to the younger patients who are able to reach intraoperative repositioning. While for the elderly with serious comminuted fractures, especially accompanied with severe osteoporosis, humeral head replacement may be the best option. Surgeons should make individualized management according to the specific fracture condition.